Minimally Invasive Vs. Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement With Rapid-Deployment Bioprostheses

Ann Thorac Surg

21 October Oct 2020 one month ago
  • Alamanni F, Polvani G

Aim of this multicenter retrospective study was to compare early and mid- term clinical and hemodynamic results of aortic valve replacement (AVR) with rapid-deployment bioprostheses (RDB) performed through conventional full-sternotomy versus mini-sternotomy.

Reference

D'Onofrio A, Tessari C, Lorenzoni G, Cibin G, Martinelli GL, Alamanni F, Polvani G, Solinas M, Massetti M, Merlo M, Vendramin I, Di Eusanio M, Mignosa C, Mangino D, Russo C, Rinaldi M, Pacini D, Salvador L, Antona C, Maselli D, De Paulis R, Luzi G, Alfieri O, De Filippo CM, Portoghese M, Musumeci F, Colli A, Gregori D, Gerosa G. Minimally Invasive Vs. Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement With Rapid-Deployment Bioprostheses. Ann Thorac Surg 2020 Oct 8;S0003-4975(20)31630-1. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.06.150.

Go to PubMed