CT Perfusion Versus Coronary CT Angiography in Patients With Suspected In-Stent Restenosis or CAD Progression

JACC Cardiovascular Imaging

23 August Aug 2019 6 years ago
  • Andreini D, Mushtaq S, Pontone G, Conte E, Guglielmo M, Baggiano A, Trabattoni D, Ravagnani P, Montorsi P,Teruzzi G,Olivares P, Fabbiocchi F, De Martini S,Calligaris G, Annoni A, Mancini ME,Formenti A, Muscogiuri G, Fiorentini C, Bartorelli A, Pepi M
QR Code

The goal of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) alone, adenosine-stress myocardial perfusion assessed by computed tomography (CTP) alone, and coronary CTA + CTP by using a 16-cm Z-axis coverage scanner versus invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) as the clinical standard.

Reference

Andreini D, Mushtaq S, Pontone G, Conte E, Collet C, Sonck J, D'Errico A, Di Odoardo L, Guglielmo M, Baggiano A, Trabattoni D, Ravagnani P, Montorsi P, Teruzzi G, Olivares P, Fabbiocchi F, De Martini S, Calligaris G, Annoni A, Mancini ME, Formenti A, Magatelli M, Consiglio E, Muscogiuri G, Lombardi F, Fiorentini C, Bartorelli AL, Pepi M. CT Perfusion Versus Coronary CT Angiography in Patients With Suspected In-Stent Restenosis or CAD Progression. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2019 Aug 8. pii: S1936-878X(19)30590-X. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.05.031.

Go to PubMed